Therefore, as a new medium of internet information dissemination, WeChat has a unique impact on the dissemination of Chinese OHI.Īs online information communication platforms launched by Tencent, WeChat public accounts (WPAs) have been popular in Chinese-speaking communities worldwide. Users can “send out” health information to a broad community through WeChat groups through a simple sharing operation via mobile terminals. Ĭompared with traditional health information dissemination through a website, WeChat-based health information dissemination is more convenient. Although the content of the different website certification systems is similar, the Chinese health website certification system is more focused on evaluating external features such as website structure and services but lacks evaluation of OHI quality.
Another comparative analysis of OHI services in China and the United States showed that the certification of OHI services in China mainly involves official website certification and internet drug information service certification, whereas the United States mainly focuses on HONcode (health information quality certification) and TRUSTe (website safety certification). The main reasons for a negative evaluation included the website organizer and sponsor information were not transparent, the disease description and drug information were not accurate, and the information source and authors’ identities were not disclosed. Approximately 50% of the 70 studies resulted in completely negative evaluations of OHI, and 27.1% of the studies had both positive and negative evaluations.
WECHAT PAY USA CODE
A review of 70 studies on the quality of OHI in 18 countries showed that the most commonly used evaluation tools globally include DISCERN, Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode), Journal of American Medical Association benchmark, and LIDA instrument. These articles used self-compiled evaluation tools to study the quality of OHI, whereas international evaluations of the quality of OHI have mostly used more mature evaluation tools. In addition, suggestions were proposed for the construction of health information websites and the improvement of the quality of network health information from the perspective of users. Another study performed at Wuhan University constructed an OHI quality evaluation standard system consisting of two primary indicators, seven secondary indicators, and seven tertiary indicators. Therefore, evaluation of the quality of OHI has attracted worldwide attention.Ī study conducted at China Renmin University investigated the quality of Chinese health information services with a self-constructed evaluation system and found that privacy protection, information integrity, accessibility, and the platform response of information services were important factors influencing the improvement of user participation. In addition, many websites often provide links to network information with irrelevant or even fake content for commercial benefit. A common view about the quality of OHI is that a substantial amount of health information should be produced in a specific medical context, which is often ignored in the internet age, leading to members of the public taking OHI out of context. Compared with traditional health information sources, internet-based online health information (OHI) is widely distributed, abundant, rapidly growing, and diverse in form. With progress of information technology, internet-based new media application platforms are becoming an important resource for the public to obtain health information.
0 kommentar(er)
